<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Dishers &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dishers.com/category/uncategorized/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dishers.com</link>
	<description>Digital fodder about our family.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:40:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twitter: Let&#8217;s save some bandwidth.</title>
		<link>http://www.dishers.com/2008/10/07/twitter-lets-save-some-bandwidth</link>
		<comments>http://www.dishers.com/2008/10/07/twitter-lets-save-some-bandwidth#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MAD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dishers.com/2008/10/07/twitter-lets-save-some-bandwidth</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the unique things about twitter is that you only get 140 characters to do so.&#160;&#160; Even with that limitation, there is still much redundant twittering.
I know there are already some standard internet shortcuts; LOL, ROFLMA, OMG, WTH, etc.
I think there’s room for a whole new suite of Twitter shortcuts that could save time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the unique things about twitter is that you only get 140 characters to do so.&#160;&#160; Even with that limitation, there is still much redundant twittering.</p>
<p>I know there are already some standard internet shortcuts; LOL, ROFLMA, OMG, WTH, etc.</p>
<p>I think there’s room for a whole new suite of Twitter shortcuts that could save time and bandwidth. I’d like to suggest a few that will cover about 80% of the tweets out there:</p>
<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" width="454" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68"><strong>Shortcut</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="181"><strong>Meaning</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="199"><strong>Usage</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">IJA</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">I Just Ate</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">IJA McDonalds or IJA Wendy’s and it was good.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">IJ1 or IJ2</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">I Just went number 1, or          <br />I Just went number 2</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">IJ1 and it burned is that normal?</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">IAM</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">In A Meeting</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">IAM and it’s boring.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">GTM</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">Going To Meeting</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">GTM, again.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">GTE</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">Going To Eat</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">GTE McDonalds</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">JWU</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">Just Woke Up.</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">JWO, what time is it?</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">GTB</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">Going To Bed</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">GTB it’s late.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">AUPC</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">Another Unsolicited Phone Call</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">AUPC from Amway.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">CTL</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">Click This Link</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">CTL <a href="http://www.somelink.com">www.somelink.com</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">SFATL</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">Something Funny at this Link</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">SFATL <a href="http://www.somelink.com">www.somelink.com</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">SSATL</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">Something Stupid at this Link</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">SSATL <a href="http://www.somelink.com">www.somelink.com</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">AIWF</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">And It Was Fun/Funny</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">IJA McDonalds AIWF</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">OS</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">Obama Sucks</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">OS!</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">MS</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">McCain Sucks</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">MS but not as much as OS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">TMU</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">The market is up</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">TMU -400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">TMD</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">The market is down</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">TMD 400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">SIAIS</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">Saw it and it sucked</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">&lt;insert movie, or something visual&gt; SIAIS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">SIAIR</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">Saw it and it rocked</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">&lt;insert movie, or something visual&gt; SIAIR</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">GI</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">Google it</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">@someperson who asked a stupid question GI</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">IWTL</td>
<td valign="top" width="181">I was too lazy</td>
<td valign="top" width="199">I would have Googled it but IWTL</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>This is just a start but if we all try real hard, I’m sure we can save some serious internet bandwidth by implementing these.</p>
<p>I’m sure there is probably a list somewhere already.&#160; Maybe even </p>
<div class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:3619d626-4644-43b2-bc46-39e3cc2c1b8a" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; float: none; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/twitter" rel="tag">twitter</a></div>
<p>something official somewhere but I didn’t Google it.&#160; IWTL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dishers.com/2008/10/07/twitter-lets-save-some-bandwidth/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mo betta server hardware.</title>
		<link>http://www.dishers.com/2007/06/12/mo-betta-server-hardware</link>
		<comments>http://www.dishers.com/2007/06/12/mo-betta-server-hardware#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MAD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dishers.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dishers.com/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.dishers.com has moved.  The hardware that www.dishers.com was hosted on was an old 1ghz, AMD Athlon.  It was the &#8217;stuff&#8217; back in the day almost 10 years ago?  It was originally my hot machine for playing Tribes!, (there&#8217;s 2 years of my life I&#8217;ll never get back).
But as we&#8217;ve gotten to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dishers.com">www.dishers.com</a> has moved.  The hardware that <a href="http://www.dishers.com">www.dishers.com</a> was hosted on was an old 1ghz, AMD Athlon.  It was the &#8217;stuff&#8217; back in the day almost 10 years ago?  It was originally my hot machine for playing Tribes!, (there&#8217;s 2 years of my life I&#8217;ll never get back).</p>
<p>But as we&#8217;ve gotten to the world of Internet 2.0 with graphically rich web sites, and more .php processing required for things like the gallery.  It was time to move this site to something a little better.  The box it&#8217;s on now is 3 years old, but it&#8217;s still about 4x the power (if not more) than the box that replaced it.</p>
<p>Things should be mo betta, and mo faster.</p>
<p>DNS&#8217;s around the world are updating as we speak.  Life is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dishers.com/2007/06/12/mo-betta-server-hardware/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the Cirrus Lives on&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.dishers.com/2007/04/25/and-the-cirrus-lives-on</link>
		<comments>http://www.dishers.com/2007/04/25/and-the-cirrus-lives-on#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MAD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chiltons_manual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrysler_cirrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrysler_product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed_sensor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transmission_flush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transmission_problems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dishers.com/?p=441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 4 years ago we purchased this 1999 Chrysler Cirrus:



It had roughly 40k miles on it.  It was a direct replacement for the Honda Wagon that we had, which was stolen.  For some reason we didn&#8217;t want another wagon, which, in hind sight was a bad idea.
We were a tad hesitant to buy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 4 years ago we purchased this 1999 Chrysler Cirrus:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/cirrus.jpg"></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.dishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/cirrus-small.jpg" alt="Cirrus" height="231" width="450" /></p>
<p></a></p>
<p>It had roughly 40k miles on it.  It was a direct replacement for the Honda Wagon that we had, which was stolen.  For some reason we didn&#8217;t want another wagon, which, in hind sight was a bad idea.</p>
<p>We were a tad hesitant to buy a Dodge/Chrysler product, especially after coming from Honda&#8217;s, but it was newer than what was stolen, had far fewer miles, and was in some ways an upgrade, leather seats, CD player, v6, cute gauges, etc, etc.  It also fit nicely with-in the budget from the insurance check.</p>
<p>It now has 117k miles and still runs pretty good for what it is.</p>
<p>The only real repairs it&#8217;s needed to date were brakes, and tires (both consumables).</p>
<p>We did go through one episode where the speed sensor died (apparently common on these).  The speedo quit, and it shifted down into first and stayed there.  This repair was $20 and about an hour and a half of my time.  Locating the dang thing was the hardest part, this sensor isn&#8217;t easy to get too.</p>
<p>We had the regular transmission flush and fill around 75k because it wasn&#8217;t shifting as smooth as it should.   Shortly there after it started acting as though the transmission was going to die.  Really rough shifting, etc.  But that simply passed and, well, it&#8217;s chugged along for another 30k miles.</p>
<p>The check engine light came on around 100k miles.  But the car still ran perfectly fine, so no rush to fix that.</p>
<p>Last week however, it hiccupped and went into limp mode.  It would start up, shift up through the gears one time then back down into 2nd gear when you came to a stop and then stayed there.  Ugh&#8230;</p>
<p>Transmission problems just suck.  The fluid was still red and clean, not burnt.  So I was fairly certain it was something electronic.  Of course the Chiltons manual in this regard was no help.</p>
<p>After a trip to the dealer, the results are in.   $180 for a different speed sensor (apparently there are two).  $250 for the EVG valve replacement, and it&#8217;s as good as new.  Or as good as it was 60k miles ago.</p>
<p>It needs a tune up.  No doubt about that, but the dealer cost for that is a whopping $450 dollars.  I think we&#8217;ll wait a bit.  It can&#8217;t be _that_ hard, or can it.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see if we get through this summer with this car and a young driver before we put another $450 in it.</p>
<p>The bottom line though is that this car has been very, very good for us.  Will we rush out and buy another Chrysler?  Probably not, but it has served us well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dishers.com/2007/04/25/and-the-cirrus-lives-on/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
